You notice summers are hotter? No, you didn’t? Neither have I. But NASA has. And they want you to know that they know that, even if it’s a lie.
What I have noticed is the color scales on local weather maps has changed. They now use red where they used to have orange to make it seem hotter.
What’s this whole global warming about? What do they want. Well they tell you it’s about saving our planet. But really it’s about your tax money, and redistributing it to others. Marxism, this time run by the UN and their minions.
Lies are fragile. They require constant attentiveness to keep them alive. The exposure of a single truth can rip through an ocean of lies, evaporating it instantly.
Did you ever wonder why global warming is a known hoax? How about we start at the beginning. We ask what are the initial conditions used for those 24 some odd computer models? Computer models are very fragile things, feed them the wrong crap, you get the same wrong crap out. We now seem to have every summer, when it gets got, the same crap coming out all the lying fountains.
Now that NASA has been conscripted into the global warming lies task force, and since most people see NASA as a source of real science … ready made for spreading the lies. Summer and hot lies.
But the problem is the hot initial conditions, if you initialize them with lies, you get lies out. The theory of global warming, all the computer models is based on the supposed CO2 imaginary blanket, neatly nestled around the equator. Having started my career as a scientist working for NASA, I have some understanding of science, and how it is supposed to work.
It’s starts with a hypothesis, that is a supposed truth, the hypothesis states we humans are supposed to see the first signs of global warming, caused by man as a layer of gas, CO2 circling the equator, it’s the dynamics that causes the heavy gas CO2 to collect there.
But in science it’s supposed to reach the point in the operation, where the hypothesis is PROVED true and the theory is supposed born, and then worshiped as true. Take
The famous Einstein theory of relativity. Where E is energy, m is mass, and c is the speed of light. The formula is dimensionally consistent and does not depend on any specific system of measurement units. The equation E = mc2 indicates that energy always exhibits relativistic mass in whatever form the energy takes.
Fair enough, but how do you prove it? Enter the A-Bomb, the first real world test. When energy is removed from a system (such as in nuclear fission or nuclear fusion), mass is always removed along with the energy. This energy retains the missing mass, which will in turn be added to any other system which absorbs it. In this situation E = mc2 can be used to calculate how much mass goes along with the removed energy. It also tells how much mass will be added to any system which later absorbs this energy.
When the a-bomb goes off, theory is proved.
OK, isn’t there some simpler ways to do this. Blowing things up, is so messy. Man turns to computer models. So how do they help. How do we define the initial conditions. Ah, that’s the tricky part with computer models. Wrong start point, wrong answer. Typically the start point is referred to as initial conditions.
Back to global warming and so-called greenhouse gases. I always thought green houses needed a impermeable roof? Well yes they do, never seen one that didn’t, hove you? So the theory needs a roof. So can’t we construct one with gas? Well yes and no. A gas would always have to have a transfer, gas does after all have to obey the Laws of Thermodynamics. OK< lets look at the roof, the warm CO2 blanket surrounding earth’s equator. Should be easy to find … A few weather balloons released at the proper points, bingo, problem solved. Find the roof, the CO2 blanket, problem solved.
Well no it’s not, the CO2 blanket is not there. Study after study has shown the same. No CO@ blanket, no roof, no global warming, at least according to this theory of how it works.
The result the theory is proved falsified. How can that be, we all know the answer, yet the very first science fact is in error. So it’s not the truth? If you are government you just do the honorable thing, you ignore the missing “hot spot” as it’s called around the equator, and carry on. You use the GIGO theory of modeling, garbage in garbage out.
Does the UN Intergovernmental Panel know this? Of course they do, they even write about it. Pretty graphs and all.
Still missing …
OK what’s next? You ask, but if the main driver of the supposed green house gas roof is missing ???
The Hot Spot has been found? Yep by fogging the data, good to go, and thereby proving it exists. So tell me, why don’t people in the real world just fill their roofless green houses with CO2. Haha, silly you.
Calculated Omission: Otherwise known as “cherry picking” data. One simple piece of information or root item of truth can derail an entire disinfo news story, so instead of trying to gloss over it, they simply pretend as if it doesn’t exist. When the fact is omitted, the lie can appear entirely rational. This tactic is also used extensively when disinformation agents and crooked journalists engage in open debate.
Just redefine “greenhouse”, word play.
At this point Obama trots out NASA, to tell the big lie. Well it’s actually paid scientists, not really NASA … but it is a real lie.
And then you cover the rest with lies as well.
But can’t other people measure the CO2 hot spot? Why yes they can, the answer came up the same. It’s not their. Hey even you can measure it …
Ever wondered why the local weather thermometers are located at airports generally? Runways are hot, and if you run the data of temperature around cities, they happen to be generally the hottest spots around. Runway slabs are very good heat absorbers. Yep they even have a name for this, it’s called urban heat islands. And a car and a thermometer can show it easily.
Figure this: If you can’t get good unambiguous results from a simple weather balloon, what chance do you have with a complicated computer model?
The final nail for me was reading the emails, the ones that mysteriously got leaked out to the Internet, it explains how the hoax was done. End of story, once a lie, forever a lie.
Lie Big, Yell it loud, Retract Quietly: Mainstream media sources (especially newspapers) are notorious for reporting flagrantly dishonest and unsupported news stories on the front page, telling the tale repeatedly, then quietly retracting those stories on the very back page, on the weekend, when they are caught. In this case, the point is to railroad the lie into the collective consciousness. Once the lie is finally exposed, it is already too late, and a large portion of the population will not notice or care when the truth comes out.
Done, let’s raise taxes.
Obama, the biggest liar of them all. Right now, he is bust Fluking it up. Women are such suckers to the Democrat lies. Sp if the government doesn’t give it to you for free, your access is being blocked by ( insert your favorite ).
