der Spiegel has finally gotten around to conceding that global warming has ended, at least for the time being.
CO2 causes nothing then? The Models are all wrong? What did you expect when you initialize them on fasle data?
Since Obozo has said he is going to tackle the global warming hoax in his next term, this is important. Europe the first to buy in, are now moving out, as they have sufficiently collapsed their economy through electricity costs.
Yesterday Spiegel science journalist Axel Bojanowski published a piece called:Klimawandel: Forscher rätseln über Stillstand bei Erderwärmung (Climate change: scientists baffled by the stop in global warming).
We’ve been waiting for this admission a long time, and watching the media reaction is interesting to say the least. Bojanowski writes that “The word has been out for quite some time now that the climate is developing differently than predicted earlier”. He poses the question: “How many more years of stagnation are needed before scientists rethink their predictions of future warming?”
Bojanowski adds (emphasis added):
15 years without warming are now behind us. The stagnation of global near-surface average temperatures shows that the uncertainties in the climate prognoses are surprisingly large. The public is now waiting with suspense to see if the next UN IPCC report, due in September, is going to discuss the warming stop.”
The big question now circulating through the stunned European media, governments and activist organisations is how could the warming stop have happened? Moreover, how do we now explain it to the public? To find an answer, Bojanowski contacted a number of sources. The result, in summary: scientists are now left only to speculate over an entire range of possible causes. Uncertainty in climate science indeed has never been greater. It’s back to square one.
But CO2 has been going up still. What’s wrong, could it be the hypothesis that CO2 produces warming, be false???
And why didn’t the whole earth fry when CO2 was 10-20 times what it is now, when the dinosaurs were around. You kow what it takes to feed really a big herbivore? How about really big trees, which is what the reality was back then. Should scientists figured that out, before putting forth their preposterous global warming hypothesis? Didn’t they no CO2 warming is logarithmic and we long ago crossed the point where all the warming that CO2 could do, it had already done? Ah yes you can prove that with a senior year high school chemistry experiment.
More here at thenotrickszone.