Sen Inhofe Sets The Record Straight On EPA And IPCC-CRU Science Use

Washington, D.C.-Sen. James M. Inhofe (R-Okla.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, today released the following YouTube video responding to EPA’s finding that greenhouse gases from mobile sources endanger public health and welfare:

Transcript:

Hello, I’m Jim Inhofe, a Republican from Oklahoma. I am the top Republican on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

Today, the Obama administration announced an unprecedented rule, one that will have far-reaching implications for each and every American. The Administration’s endangerment finding will lead to a wave of new regulations and bureaucracy that will wreak havoc on the American economy, destroy millions of jobs, and force consumers to pay more for electricity and gasoline.

This bureaucratic nightmare is based on flawed science. Lisa Jackson, Obama’s EPA Administrator, admitted to me publicly that EPA based its action today in good measure on the findings of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC. She told me that EPA accepted those findings without any serious, independent analysis to see whether they were true. Of course, we now have thousands of emails showing several of the UN’s top scientists apparently evading laws requiring transparency, defaming scientists with opposing viewpoints, and manipulating data to fit preconceived opinions. They cooked the science.

For example, some of the scientists involved worked to exclude inconvenient facts — most notably the fact that there has been no global warming since 1998. The scandal, which has come to be known as “climategate,” has rocked the scientific community. The Atlantic Monthly said, “The stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering.” And the U.K. Telegraph said, “This is the worst scientific scandal of our generation.”

The UN is investigating it; leading academic and scientific institutions are investigating it; and I am investigating it. Yet, Democratic leaders in Congress and the Obama Administration have dismissed it. I agree with Sen. Joe Lieberman, who said of climategate, “We ought to be demanding that that be cleaned up. We ought to be angry about it.”

The endangerment finding also will have virtually no impact on global warming. That’s because India and China, two of the world’s leading emitters of CO2, are left out. Of course, next week President Obama will try to spin “commitments” from India and China to address their emissions — yet these commitments will be effectively meaningless.

So, our jobs and our emissions will move to countries that have few if any environmental requirements. Don’t take my word for it; just ask EPA Administrator Jackson, who said “U.S. action alone will not impact world CO2 levels.”

So today the American people are getting a raw deal: all cost with no benefit. Yet, the Obama Administration is moving forward anyway. Don’t forget that today’s action was taken just as the UN’s Copenhagen global warming conference gets started. President Obama will attend. He desperately wants to show the world he is doing something about global warming. Yet putting on this show has costs and the American people will pay for it — many with higher energy bills and many with their jobs.

Hoax-N-Haaaagen

Wait, before the conference start, we just need a short adjustment, to hot the place up.

Climategate put to song:

Here is what the earth’s temperature looks like without UN/CRU FRAUD:

And this is the UN Chart with the fraud fixes:

See the ‘fix’? The Medieval Warm Period(MWP) has gone missing. And mysteriously, the fraud ‘hockey stick’ is the dominant feature left.

Five million year Paleoclimate, for perspective:

The cycling ice ages started between 2,5 and 3 million years ago, when plate tectonics finally cut off the Isthmus of Panama to ocean currents. The volcanoes pushed up by the Pacific Plate and silting did the deed.

I Assure You, It’s Only A Meer Scratch

Consider this fact, if the emails and source code had not been leaked to the world, the AGW fraud would still be as big as it is now shown to be.

And to think that a president of the USA buys into the lies.

Palin Says Mr President, Abandon Copenhagen

Here’s what she has to say:

“Mr. President: Boycott Copenhagen; Investigate Your Climate Change ‘Experts’

“The president’s decision to attend the international climate conference in Copenhagen needs to be reconsidered in light of the unfolding Climategate scandal. The leaked e-mails involved in Climategate expose the unscientific behavior of leading climate scientists who deliberately destroyed records to block information requests, manipulated data to “hide the decline” in global temperatures, and conspired to silence the critics of man-made global warming. I support Senator James Inhofe’s call for a full investigation into this scandal. Because it involves many of the same personalities and entities behind the Copenhagen conference, Climategate calls into question many of the proposals being pushed there, including anything that would lead to a cap and tax plan.

“Policy should be based on sound science, not snake oil. I took a stand against such snake oil science when I sued the federal government over its decision to list the polar bear as an endangered species despite the fact that the polar bear population has increased. I’ve never denied the reality of climate change; in fact, I was the first governor to create a subcabinet position to deal specifically with the issue. I saw the impact of changing weather patterns firsthand while serving as governor of our only Arctic state. But while we recognize the effects of changing water levels, erosion patterns, and glacial ice melt, we cannot primarily blame man’s activities for the earth’s cyclical weather changes. The drastic economic measures being pushed by dogmatic environmentalists won’t change the weather, but will dramatically change our economy for the worse.

“Policy decisions require real science and real solutions, not junk science and doomsday scare tactics pushed by an environmental priesthood that capitalizes on the public’s worry and makes them feel that owning an SUV is a “sin” against the planet. In his inaugural address, President Obama declared his intention to “restore science to its rightful place.” Boycotting Copenhagen while this scandal is thoroughly investigated would send a strong message that the United States government will not be a party to fraudulent scientific practices. Saying no to Copenhagen and cap and tax are first steps in “restoring science to its rightful place. – Sarah Palin”

CBC Finds A Moment of Clarity On ClimateGate

Let us not forget the Dan Rather defense: “The data is fake but accurate”. Because this is where it will lead in the coming days.

“You wouldn’t accept that at a grade 9 science fair…” – CBC

Wow, just wow. What an editorial. The CBC’s Rex Murphy on Climategate.

And lest anyone doubt how big this story is, now Sarah Palin has weighed in. On her Facebook page she urges President Obama to boycott Copenhagen. She totally gets it:

The president’s decision to attend the international climate conference in Copenhagen needs to be reconsidered in light of the unfolding Climategate scandal. The leaked e-mails involved in Climategate expose the unscientific behavior of leading climate scientists who deliberately destroyed records to block information requests, manipulated data to “hide the decline” in global temperatures, and conspired to silence the critics of man-made global warming. I support Senator James Inhofe’s call for a full investigation into this scandal. Because it involves many of the same personalities and entities behind the Copenhagen conference, Climategate calls into question many of the proposals being pushed there, including anything that would lead to a cap and tax plan.

She concludes and if she goes on like this, we really ought to start thinking her of a serious candidate for next president: way to go, Sarah!

Policy decisions require real science and real solutions, not junk science and doomsday scare tactics pushed by an environmental priesthood that capitalizes on the public’s worry and makes them feel that owning an SUV is a “sin” against the planet. In his inaugural address, President Obama declared his intention to “restore science to its rightful place.” Boycotting Copenhagen while this scandal is thoroughly investigated would send a strong message that the United States government will not be a party to fraudulent scientific practices. Saying no to Copenhagen and cap and tax are first steps in “restoring science to its rightful place.”

Yep. From your mouth to God’s ear, let us hope.

And if you think it’s all about emails, it’s not. The real FRAUD is found in the software code. That would be the code that is used to generate the falsified ‘hockey stick’. The code is laid out for the laymen in this posting on Anthony Watts website “WattsUpWithThat“.

This following short analysis might be easy to understand the reasons why the ’so-called scientists’ would not release the code for scrutiny. If you can’t independently run the code and get the same results as the output the Fraudsters display, then something is wrong. If you can run the code and get the output displayed, then you only need analyze the software code to see what is wrong that produces the FAKED hockey stick. Easy for software engineers, not so easy for lay people — Which is what this is based on, fooling the lay people into paying massive new taxes.

The only way to make the fraud work, is to keep everything secret, something that is truly ‘anti-science’.

The Left Reacts To Climategate

The BBC Begins To Crack …

They can no longer deny that the AGW fraud has been exposed for what it is, fraud …

Climate e-mail hack ‘will impact on Copenhagen summit’:

E-mails hacked from a climate research institute suggest climate change does not have a human cause, according to Saudi Arabia’s lead climate negotiator.

Mohammad Al-Sabban told BBC News that the issue will have a “huge impact” on next week’s UN climate summit, with countries unwilling to cut emissions.

He said the UN summit should encourage a “full investigation” of the affair.

Climat Fraud

Professor Ian Plimer condemned the climate change lobby as “climate comrades” keeping the “gravy train” going. In a talk just days before the start of a Hope-n-hagen climate summit attended by world leaders in Copenhagen, Prof Plimer said

Governments were treating the public like “fools” and using climate change to increase taxes.

He said carbon dioxide has had no impact on temperature and that recent warming was part of the natural cycle of climate stretching over ­billions of years.

If you have to argue your science by using fraud, your science is not valid.

—- Professor Pilmer

What? You Didn’t Want The Help?

Australian Parliament Rejects Their Version of Cap & Trade

What looked like a sure thing a few weeks ago just got voted down in the Australian Senate. There has been a bunch of drama over this bill, including the ousting of the main opposition leader after he started to go along with PM Rudd’s plans to send the Australian economy back to the Stone Age.