From One Hoax to The Next, Just Change The Name And Keep Going — End Fossil Fuel Use Is The Goal

June 24, 2012

Activists slam Rio+20 sustainable development summit as a ‘hoax’ — Simple, Green is The new Red

As delegates ended the three-day Rio+20 summit with a 53-page statement called “The Future We Want,” activists slammed the U.N. conference on sustainable development as a “failure of epic proportions.”

OK, how about the future the people want? I bet it sure isn’t one without DDT, cars and electricity. Who wants to live like third world “bush people”.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described the document as a “firm foundation for social, economic and environmental well-being.”

“Rio+20 has affirmed fundamental principles — renewed essential commitments — and given us new direction,” Ban said in a statement.

Five cities fighting for climate survival — What, I guess we should all join in a group hug?

Hug your local oil wells, or coal miners, they supply the blood of modern life.

But the conservation group Greenpeace said the summit, formally known as the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, was “over before it started.”

It came 20 years after the Earth Summit in Rio which adopted Agenda 21, an action plan for sustainable development in the 21st century.

During the meeting, the U.N. said some $513 billion had been committed to a number of issues including energy, food security, access to drinking water and ocean management.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Campaigners call Rio+20 summit a “hoax” and a “failure of epic proportions”
  • The three-day meeting ended with an agreement on the document “The Future We Want”
  • U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon says Rio+20 “affirmed fundamental principles”
  • $513 billion has been committed to a number of causes, the United Nations says

An apt conclusion for the thousands of foie gras sucking, haute toting guests. Wanna be rulers of the world.

Don’t know who pledged the money, but they wanted at least a 100 $Billion a year from the USA. Anybody know what Obama did? Anybody care?


Patrick Moore: Greenpeace Founder Questions Windfarms

January 6, 2012
I suppose only Greenpeace knows this fact, that any engineer could tell you without wasting money only building they to find out… It’s what engineers do.
RIDGETOWN – Southwestern Ontario’s flourishing wind energy industry came under fire Wednesday from the co-founder of Greenpeace.Dr. Patrick Moore told more than 1,000 area farmers the industry destroys more jobs than it creates, and causes energy prices to climb for all users.

“The industry is a destroyer of wealth and negative to the economy,” said Moore, speaking at the 19th annual Southwest Agricultural Conference at Ridgetown campus of the University of Guelph.

Moore, who now refers to himself as the “sensible environmentalist,” said the solar bubble has burst and thinks the wind bubble is about to burst.

“I’m happy for the farmers who are receiving royalties for allowing the wind towers to be built on their farms,” he said. “They deserve it — but the cost to consumers will continue to climb — partly because of rate increases and partly due to tax increases.”

Moore said there wouldn’t be wind farms in southwestern Ontario if taxpayers weren’t paying the bill.

“They are ridiculously expensive and don’t work half the time,” he said. “And no matter how many are built, they won’t replace coal, gas or hydro or nuclear plants, because they are continuous and wind is not always reliable.”


Moore told his audience the wind energy industry in Spain has resulted in a 30% unemployment rate among people under the age of 30.

The speaker was also highly critical of the organization he co-founded, claiming it’s counter-productive today from an environmental standpoint.

“The organization should at least base its positions on science,” he said.

Moore said Greenpeace, launched in British Columbia, is now based in Europe. He spent 15 years with the organization chasing whaling boats, trying to stop the seal hunt, and protesting against hydrogen bomb testing.

He now serves as chair and chief scientist of Greenspirit Strategies.

“I was against three or four things every day of my life for 15 years,” he said. “I decided to become a sensible environmentalist and have spent the last 25 years doing just that.”

Moore described as “ridiculous,” the claims by Greenpeace that chlorine is the devil’s element and PVC is the poison plastic.

“Most of our medicines are based on chlorine,” he said.

He blasted Greenpeace for opposing golden rice, which he said helps prevent blindness in as many as 500,000 children.

Moore took exception to the stance against salmon farming by both Greenpeace and Dr. David Suzuki.

“We have to recognize that poverty is the worst environmental problem today,” he said.


Trying To Salvage The Debacle They Created

February 5, 2010

Wave Bye Bye: Greenpeace calls for UN IPCC climate chief Pachauri to step down more here It’s not like they don’t think the fraud is true, they just seem to know a smelly carcass when they smell one.

She’s dead Jim.


The List Of Non-Peer Reviewed UN IPCC Crap Science Grows Longer

January 29, 2010

For today’s scam at the UN IPCC we give you ‘coral-reef-gate’. The ‘gates’ are continuing to open on the fraud that was formerly known as ‘man-caused global warming’. Seems like every kook in the world who had a beef got it into the UN IPCC AR4 report just to make it more scary for ignorant people. I think maybe that the intent of the UN’s report was to NOT DO THAT, ya know, the world’s policy makers were supposed to be given only real science and peer reviewed ‘best science’ available.

Not junk science  … Like they apparently did.

Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 105 other followers

%d bloggers like this: