President Meets With His Fan Club

June 12, 2013

Behind closed doors, to cheer up the the Prezzy in these scandal ridden times. Apparently Holder’s closed door meeting didn’t go so well so send in the top man in charge of all these scandals and see if that works.

Don’t you just wonder what the People think of all this? Nixon never did this crap with the media, they would take him apart for this stuff. Are they now this much in love for Berry by the media, that anything goes?

All the lap dog stooges were there. These reporters used to work for you, are now just the presidential lap dogs …

One thing to note, Presidents never have off the record meeting with reporters. It’s unseemly that the President would talk to his stooge reporters, and not allow the people to hear what is said. Imagine if this were the evil Bush.

Ask your self is the press in our country already dead to the people?

Notice the fact that there was no advance notice that a closed door meet up with the pressy was made, the media just assumed it was a staffer holding a background meeting with the press… Which has been pretty much standard with Presidents in the past, staffers would give off the record, background briefings to the press … but highly unusual that the principal would do this …

PRESIDENT OBAMA SURPRISES REPORTERS WITH HIGHLY UNUSUAL MOVE … Isn’t it bad enough that the media these days are nothing but DNC press office extension hacks. Heck Hugo Chavez after a few years of real reporting, just had them all killed. Is that where we are headed.

It’s time you so-called reporters took note of what you are dong to yourselves.

President Barack Obama on Tuesday held a surprise off-the-record meeting with a select group of reporters at the White House, a highly unusual move that has been described by some media outlets as an attempt to “schmooze” the press amid the multiple scandals tarnishing the Obama administration.

While it is normal for White House officials to meet with journalists for off-the-record “background briefing sessions,” the president rarely — if ever — attends the meetings in person. Reporters are prohibited from mentioning attendees at the meeting by name or directly quoting them.

A group of about two dozen reporters from the New York Times, the Huffington Post, the Washington Post, TIME, McClatchy, Politico, the Tribune Papers, NPR, Bloomberg, USA Today and AFP were reportedly slated to talk with White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough. Then, out of nowhere, Obama made a surprise appearance.

To tend his flock?

While reporters who attended the meeting were hesitant to talk about it, New York Times White House reporter Peter Baker told BuzzFeed that reporters were not aware the president would be in the “briefing session.” Had he been aware, Baker explained, he and and his editors “would have reconsidered whether to attend.”

How about hell no we don’t do that closed door crap.

“Our concern about off-the-record sessions with the president is that they not become substitutes for opportunities to ask questions and get answers on the record, which after all is our job,” he added.

Your job is to report to the people what has happened have you forgot that?

Relations between the White House and the press, once a very friendly affair, have grown at least somewhat more chilly after it was revealed that the Justice Department secretly collected phone records on several Associated Press reporters while investigating a national security leak.

The DOJ also went after Fox News reporter James Rosen for reporting on classified information, naming him a likely criminal “co-conspirator” and collecting his personal emails and his parents’ phone records.

We need to decide what use as a fact based reporter is our media? Have they now gone fan club all the time?

Personally I think the lamestream media are already dead. It’s all agenda after all, everything that is reporter has to meet the leftists agenda.


Its Unconstitutional: Fourth amendment Violation — That Even The ACLU Can See…

June 11, 2013

And they gritted their teeth all the way to the courthouse.

Today, the ACLU did what the ACLU does best… file lawsuits.  This time it was against the Obama Administration for illegally collecting hoovering up phone records of millions of Americans.

The New York Times reports,

The American Civil Liberties Union on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against the Obama administration over its “dragnet” collection of logs of domestic phone calls, contending that the once-secret program — whose existence was exposed by a former National Security Agency contractor last week — is illegal and asking a judge to both stop it and order the records purged.

The lawsuit, filed in New York, could set up an eventual Supreme Court test. It could also focus attention on this disclosure amid the larger heap of top secret surveillance matters that were disclosed by Edward J. Snowden, a former N.S.A. contractor who came forward on Sunday to say he was the source of a series of disclosures by The Guardian and The Washington Post.

The program “gives the government a comprehensive record of our associations and public movements, revealing a wealth of detail about our familial, political, professional, religious and intimate associations,” the complaint says, adding that it “is likely to have a chilling effect on whistle-blowers and others who would otherwise contact” the A.C.L.U. for legal assistance.

A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment.


Did Verizon Build A Fiber Optics Cable To Give Feds Access

June 11, 2013

Law breakers prefer to work in secret …

That’s the allegation contained in a class action lawsuit, and it was reported by no less than the New York Times in 2007.  Business Insider noted this and other troubling information on the possible magnitude of NSA spying on Americans.

Over the weekend James Risen and Eric Lichtblau of The New York Times – who won a Pulitzer Prize in 2005 for this story on the NSA gaining the cooperation of U.S. telecommunications companies to obtain backdoor access to customer data - mentioned a detail from 2007 (emphasis ours):

In Virginia, a telecommunications consultant reported, Verizon had set up a dedicated fiber-optic line running from New Jersey to Quantico, Va., home to a large military base, allowing government officials to gain access to all communications flowing through the carrier’s operations center.

(snip)

The news about the Verizon-NSA fiber optic connection came from a class action lawsuit brought by a former AT&T engineer who worked on a proposal to give the the NSA access to all the global phone and email traffic that ran through an AT&T network center in Bedminster, N.J.

The Israeli hardware, which can record data that comes through an internet protocol network, was discovered by a former AT&T engineer named Mark Klein and confirmed by former NSA senior executive Thomas Drake.

Another former NSA employee named William Binney, who, like Snowden, believes the NSA’s surveillance has gone too far, says that ever since 9/11 the NSA has been hoarding electronic data – phone calls, GPS information, emails, social media, banking and travel records, entire government databases - and analyzes, in real time, “all of the attributes that any individual has” in addition to making networks of connections between individuals.

Read more at americanthinker.com …


Ron Paul On Government Spying: “Should We Be Shocked?”

June 10, 2013

Last week we saw dramatic new evidence of illegal government surveillance of our telephone calls, and of the National Security Agency’s deep penetration into American companies such as Facebook and Microsoft to spy on us. The media seemed shocked.

Many of us are not so surprised.

Some of us were arguing back in 2001 with the introduction of the so-called PATRIOT Act that it would pave the way for massive US government surveillance—not targeting terrorists but rather aimed against American citizens. We were told we must accept this temporary measure to provide government the tools to catch those responsible for 9/11. That was nearly twelve years and at least four wars ago.

Read the rest of this entry »


Liberal Pundit Krugman: ‘We Are Kind of’ an ‘Authoritarian Surveillance State’

June 10, 2013

Wake up kiidies, the Nig Government your parents warned you about is here … Trust in Big Government has been forfeited … The NYTs had it right in the first place … New York Times editorial board says administration has ‘lost all credibility’. Then the Obama’s took out the clubs and the NYTs had to walk it back. Say isn’t this how they did it in Venezuela … eventually Hugo got tired of it all, and just outright killed all the news and TV owners … Nudge, shove, shoot. The totalitarian way.

Here’s the clip:

Part of a panel on This Week with George Stephanopoulos, Krugman offered his take on the bombshell NSA spying revelations:

“…there are different kinds of surveillance states. You can have a democratic surveillance state which collects as little data as possible and tells you as much as possible about what it’s doing. Or you could have an authoritarian surveillance state which collects as much as possible and tells the public as little as possible. And we are kind of on the authoritarian side.”

Krugman’s statement followed fellow panelist George Will’s observation that “we’re using technologies of information gathering that didn’t exist 20 years ago, that are terribly important but terribly invasive, and they require reposing extraordinary trust in the executive branch of government which some of us think it has recently forfeited.”

Part of a panel on This Week with George Stephanopoulos, Krugman offered his take on the bombshell NSA spying revelations:

“…there are different kinds of surveillance states. You can have a democratic surveillance state which collects as little data as possible and tells you as much as possible about what it’s doing. Or you could have an authoritarian surveillance state which collects as much as possible and tells the public as little as possible. And we are kind of on the authoritarian side.”

Krugman’s statement followed fellow panelist George Will’s observation that “we’re using technologies of information gathering that didn’t exist 20 years ago, that are terribly important but terribly invasive, and they require reposing extraordinary trust in the executive branch of government which some of us think it has recently forfeited.”

 


Big Government

June 9, 2013

We’re watching for terrorists!!!

big-government

Sure you are.

Did you know you shoudl join Michelle program for people who are too fat. And you qualify.

And your car is definitely NOT a proper Obama approved green car.

domestic-spy

Any thing else I’ll have our switchboard call you.

Oops there they are now …

phone-DNA


Are They Now Racists?

June 7, 2013

Criticism begets racism so it must be … Is this the tyranny your parents told you about???

New York Times: The administration has now lost all credibility.

Within hours of the disclosure that federal authorities routinely collect data on phone calls Americans make, regardless of whether they have any bearing on a counterterrorism investigation, the Obama administration issued the same platitude it has offered every time President Obama has been caught overreaching in the use of his powers: Terrorists are a real menace and you should just trust us to deal with them because we have internal mechanisms (that we are not going to tell you about) to make sure we do not violate your rights.

Those reassurances have never been persuasive — whether on secret warrants to scoop up a news agency’s phone records or secret orders to kill an American suspected of terrorism — especially coming from a president who once promised transparency and accountability.

The administration has now lost all credibility on this issue. Mr. Obama is proving the truism that the executive branch will use any power it is given and very likely abuse it. That is one reason we have long argued that the Patriot Act, enacted in the heat of fear after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks by members of Congress who mostly had not even read it, was reckless in its assignment of unnecessary and overbroad surveillance powers.

A president how thinks of himself as king.


NYT: He has lost all credibility…

June 7, 2013

NYT: He has lost all credibility… I assume that’s code for the Obama, one too many lies.

Welcome to Obama’s Internet from Hell, enjoy your stay. The Obama police state has everything you will need, except freedom. And of course we limit the number of people we let in, that’s what the Death Panels you laughed at when we told you about the details of Obamacare. You remember that right.

Hey, I read the whole stinking law, all 2000 plus pages, it’s tyranny in the making … and the IRS will run you life. Why do you think they party so much. Fun, fun, fun, with your life.

The tyranny your parents were talking about, it’s at the front door. Open at your risk…

New York Times editorial board says administration has ‘lost all credibility’

The New York Times editorial board, which twice endorsed President Obama and has championed many planks of his agenda, on Thursday turned on the president over the government’s mass collection of phone data — saying the administration has “lost all credibility.”

The grey lady’s editorial section lately has shown frustration with the administration’s civil liberties record. It has criticized the escalation of the lethal drone program, and it lashed out after the Justice Department acknowledged seizing reporters’ phone records last month.

The report that the National Security Agency has been collecting phone records from millions of Verizon subscribers appeared to be the last straw.

An editorial published late Thursday said the administration was using the “same platitude” it uses in every case of overreach — that “terrorists are a real menace and you should just trust us.”

Read more at foxnews.com


The Press Spying Scandal Grows, The Fires Get Hotter, And The Flames Go Higher

May 31, 2013

The closed door confessional , or more likely just marching orders to the Press … Time to go … You may have gotten away with Fast and Furious, but that was then …

AP CEO: ‘Thousands And Thousands’ Of Phone Records Seized… 

PRESS REVOLTS OVER OFF-RECORD MEET…

NYT WON’T ATTEND…

CNN: NO…

HUFFPO: NO GO…

FOX NO!

POLITICO: WE’LL BE THERE…

REPORTERS NOW PRIESTS…

And the IRS Tea Party SCANDAL IS EVEN EASIER FOR PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND. And bids badly for ObamaCare … The health care system from hell. Oh you will pay and pay, for what you thought was to be free.


Press Revolts: Over Off The Record Meet

May 30, 2013

It’s funny, because it’s all a lover’s quarrel.

Really why would they think that … Holder just wants to give them guidelines on how to report. Who needs the First Amendment?

Attorney General Eric Holder’s plans to sit down with media representatives to discuss guidelines for handling investigations into leaks to the news media have run into trouble.

The Associated Press issued a statement Wednesday objecting to plans for the meetings to be off the record.

“If it is not on the record, AP will not attend and instead will offer our views on how the regulations should be updated in an open letter,”

said Erin Madigan White, the AP’s media relations manager.

The New York Times is taking the same position.

“It isn’t appropriate for us to attend an off-the-record meeting with the attorney general,”

executive editor Jill Abramson said in a statement.

Remember what happen to the press in Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela …it’s for your own good.

 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 106 other followers

%d bloggers like this: