Polar Bears

Ho hum. yes liberal lies die young. As son as truth catches up with them.

Author Zac Unger was originally drawn to the arctic circle to write a “mournful elegy” about how global warming was decimating the polar bear populations. He was surprised to find that the polar bears were not in such dire straits after all.

“There are far more polar bears alive today than there were 40 years ago,” Unger told NPR in an interview about his new book, “Never Look a Polar Bear in The Eye.” “There are about 25,000 polar bears alive today worldwide. In 1973, there was a global hunting ban. So once hunting was dramatically reduced, the population exploded.”

Polar bears thrive: A surprise for Sen Boxer Committee, which preferred alarm to scientific forecasts

Goof balls trying to run your life and rule the world, always are wrong.

This is all about the polar bears and how the alarmist scare tactic resulted in miserable failure.

In an article titled “Healthy polar bear count confounds doomsayers,” Paul Waldie in The Globe and Mail reported on 4 April…

“The number of bears along the western shore of Hudson Bay, believed to be among the most threatened bear sub populations, stands at 1,013 and could be even higher, according to the results of an aerial survey released Wednesday by the Government of Nunavut. That’s 66 per cent higher than estimates by other researchers who forecasted the numbers would fall to as low as 610 because of warming temperatures that melt ice faster and ruin bears’ ability to hunt. The Hudson Bay region, which straddles Nunavut and Manitoba, is critical because it’s considered a bellwether for how polar bears are doing elsewhere in the Arctic.”

This report will come us no surprise to followers of theclimatebet.com, where we prefer scientific forecasting to politically motivated alarmism. For a recap on scientific forecasting’s contribution to the polar bear population question, Scott Armstrong’s letter 2008 to Senator Barbara Boxer, who chaired a hearing on the issue, is here.

The 2008 paper on polar bear population forecasting, by Scott Armstrong, Kesten Green, and Willie Soon, is available here.

To see the rest of Paul Waldie’s report on the happy state of the polar bear population in 2012, see here.

Ever seen a polar bear eye ball to eye ball? If so you know running won’t help you live. I have, and the only savior is a big gun and sharp aim. Where we went during out research they had bear proof chain link fencing around the doors, because once the polar bears figured out where lunch came from, they just hung around their.

Apparently Sen Boxer and the Obama administration people prefer alarmism without facts.

Healthy polar bear count confounds doomsayers

Just throw in bucket-fulls of grant money, try and link polar bear decline to that all important liberal heart tig lies, and presto. A big research community is created, and sometimes the results aren’t what government wanted when it granted out all that money in the first place.

Did you know polar bears have been around for only about 250,000 years. And did you know they are basically brown bears who moved north, and turned white because the color change made seal hunting easier? Species have been doing these sort of migration and evolution thing since the beginning.

And did you know why their species declined? Simple really hunting by humans. Seems man does not like too many big scary animals around. In 1973, the International Agreement on the Conservation of Polar Bears was signed by all five nations whose territory is inhabited by polar bears Canada, Denmark, Norway, the Soviet Union, and the United States. Member countries agreed to place restrictions on recreational and commercial hunting, ban hunting from aircraft and icebreakers, and conduct further research.

Before then it was basically anything goes.

After the 1973 treaty, polar bear numbers started steadily increasing.

So tell me, why is anybody surprised, at least why do the feign surprise. Don’t they know? Read the rest with the above facts in mind. Remember these polar bear researchers are supposedly the experts.

Onward … The debate about climate change and its impact on polar bears has intensified with the release of a survey that shows the bear population in a key part of northern Canada is far larger than many scientists thought, and might be growing.

The number of bears along the western shore of Hudson Bay, believed to be among the most threatened bear sub populations, stands at 1,013 and could be even higher, according to the results of an aerial survey released Wednesday by the Government of Nunavut. That’s 66 per cent higher than estimates by other researchers who forecasted the numbers would fall to as low as 610 because of warming temperatures that melt ice faster and ruin bears’ ability to hunt. The Hudson Bay region, which straddles Nunavut and Manitoba, is critical because it’s considered a bellwether for how polar bears are doing elsewhere in the Arctic.

Polar Bears Eat Their Cubs

Perhaps if more Warmists spent time where the polar bears live, this wouldn’t have to happen — Go to Ft Churchill Canada,  where I did. You can go outside without a bear rifle …

(BBC News) It is an image that is sure to shock many people.

An adult polar bear is seen dragging the body of a cub that it has just killed across the Arctic sea ice.

Polar bears normally hunt seals but if these are not available, the big predators will seek out other sources of food – even their own kind.

The picture was taken by environmental photojournalist Jenny Ross in Olgastretet, a stretch of water in the Svalbard archipelago.

“This type of intraspecific predation has always occurred to some extent,” she told BBC News.

Like most bears, male polar bears will often kill cubs, so they can mate with the mama polar bears. And, because they are simply mean SOB’s. Obviously, that can’t be the reason, according to Ross

“However, there are increasing numbers of observations of it occurring, particularly on land where polar bears are trapped ashore, completely food-deprived for extended periods of time due to the loss of sea ice as a result of climate change.”

Even if that were the case, instead of anecdotal, that doesn’t prove that the loss of sea ice is caused by man induced global warming. Oh, and the picture was taken in July 2010……you know, during the summer, when sea ice is at its lowest every year. But, wait, what’s this?

Ross said there was another bear in the area and she speculated that it might have been the mother of the dead juvenile.

Ross then goes on to speculate that globull warming is causing the bears to seek out other food stuffs, and doesn’t bother mentioning that in the animal kingdom, males often kill cubs, thereby leaving the mother with no offspring and ready to mate again. I wonder what the bears did back during the previous warm periods, when it was even hotter? They didn’t have the garbage cans from human encroachment. I guess they all starved to death.

Global Warming Hoax: People Are So Outraged At Coca-Cola’s Holiday Cans That It’s Abandoning Them After Just One Month

Coca-Cola tried to revive its polar bear mascot with a wintry white can design for Coca-Cola Classic, but just one month after launch, it’s abandoning the project and reverting to red, reports Mike Esterl at the Wall Street Journal.

In Support Of Gov. Perry About The Global Warming Hoax

Most are misquoting him, so here is his exact words. In New Hampshire, Rick Perry said:

“I do think global warming has been politicised … We are seeing almost weekly or even daily scientists are coming forward and questioning the original idea that man-made global warming is what is causing our climate to change. Yes, our climate has changed. It has been changing ever since the Earth was formed. But I do not buy into a group of scientists who have, in some cases, been found to be manipulating data.“

Yes indeed they have. And many have been falsifying data, see the latest about Charles Monnett and the polar bear hoax.

Nearly every single point in Al Gore infamous fiction hoax film has been scientifically investigated and falsified. The others were too stupid too even bother. Even courts have ruled it fiction in the UK.

Take the one of the warm CO2 blanket surrounding the planet, and it’s mystery, like where it is. In does not exist. Now that point alone would in a sane world label the film as a hoax, a movie of fiction and the famous scissors jack.

The latest scare is the danger of walruses stampeding … Well not exactly, but being rendered extinct.

Polarbeargate, Gets Better

PolarBearGate: Charles Monnett’s wife ‘peer-reviewed’ his polar bear paper! Monnett was questioned on the ‘pal review’ on this paper by his wife Lisa Rotterman

Visit Site for details