From One Hoax to The Next, Just Change The Name And Keep Going — End Fossil Fuel Use Is The Goal

June 24, 2012

Activists slam Rio+20 sustainable development summit as a ‘hoax’ — Simple, Green is The new Red

As delegates ended the three-day Rio+20 summit with a 53-page statement called “The Future We Want,” activists slammed the U.N. conference on sustainable development as a “failure of epic proportions.”

OK, how about the future the people want? I bet it sure isn’t one without DDT, cars and electricity. Who wants to live like third world “bush people”.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described the document as a “firm foundation for social, economic and environmental well-being.”

“Rio+20 has affirmed fundamental principles — renewed essential commitments — and given us new direction,” Ban said in a statement.

Five cities fighting for climate survival — What, I guess we should all join in a group hug?

Hug your local oil wells, or coal miners, they supply the blood of modern life.

But the conservation group Greenpeace said the summit, formally known as the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, was “over before it started.”

It came 20 years after the Earth Summit in Rio which adopted Agenda 21, an action plan for sustainable development in the 21st century.

During the meeting, the U.N. said some $513 billion had been committed to a number of issues including energy, food security, access to drinking water and ocean management.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Campaigners call Rio+20 summit a “hoax” and a “failure of epic proportions”
  • The three-day meeting ended with an agreement on the document “The Future We Want”
  • U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon says Rio+20 “affirmed fundamental principles”
  • $513 billion has been committed to a number of causes, the United Nations says

An apt conclusion for the thousands of foie gras sucking, haute toting guests. Wanna be rulers of the world.

Don’t know who pledged the money, but they wanted at least a 100 $Billion a year from the USA. Anybody know what Obama did? Anybody care?


Hey If You Are Going Nuts, Why Not Go All In? The tab for U.N.’s Rio summit: Trillions per year in new taxes, transfers and price hikes

April 20, 2012

You knew this was going to happen. Once the Global warming hoax was fully exposed as, well you know, a man made hoax, where did you think our one world government bureaucrats were going to get the money for them to hand out. The UN Candy Man if you will … But from you. They’ve got to have the world’s money and they won’t stop until they get it.

You’re gonna pay for all that carbon one way or the other. It matters not that it’s all a lie, you gonna pay.

So you trust the job they will do, after the Oil For Food? How about protecting the people of Africa, especially Christians, from Muslim terrorists? Not me.

And people wonder why gun sales have gone through the roof.

This is all called the UN’s Agenda 21. In case you don’t know, google “Agenda 21″ and see for yourself. Been in the works for a long time.

FNC reports:

The upcoming United Nations environmental conference on sustainable development will consider  a breathtaking array of carbon taxes, transfers of trillions of dollars from wealthy countries to poor ones, and new spending programs to guarantee that populations around the world are protected from the effects of the very programs the world organization wants to implement, according to stunning U.N. documents examined  by Fox News.

The main goal of the much-touted, Rio + 20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, scheduled to be held in Brazil from June 20-23, and which Obama Administration officials have supported,  is to make dramatic and enormously expensive changes  in the way that the world does nearly everything—or, as one of the documents puts it, “a fundamental shift in the way we think and act.”

Among the proposals on how the “challenges can and must be addressed,” according to U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon:

–More than $2.1 trillion a year in wealth transfers from rich countries to poorer ones, in the name of fostering “green infrastructure, ”  “climate adaptation” and other “green economy” measures.

–New carbon taxes for industrialized countries that could cost about $250 billion a year, or 0.6 percent of Gross Domestic Product, by 2020. Other environmental taxes are mentioned, but not specified.

–Further unspecified price hikes that extend beyond fossil fuels to anything derived from agriculture, fisheries, forestry, or other kinds of land and water use, all of which would be radically reorganized. These cost changes would “contribute to a more level playing field between established, ‘brown’ technologies and newer, greener ones.”

– Major global social spending programs, including a “social protection floor” and “social safety nets” for the world’s most vulnerable social groups  for reasons of “equity.”

–Even more social benefits for those displaced by the green economy revolution—including those put out of work in undesirable fossil fuel industries. The benefits, called “investments,”  would include “access to nutritious food, health services, education, training and retraining, and unemployment benefits.”

–A guarantee that if those sweeping benefits weren’t enough, more would be granted. As one of the U.N. documents puts it:  “Any adverse effects of changes in prices of goods and services vital to the welfare of vulnerable groups must be compensated for and new livelihood opportunities provided.”


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 98 other followers

%d bloggers like this: