Do you understand how spy drones affect public safety? In ways we would not understand, or is it just more made-up stuff from the Obama regime. To scare the sheep?
Drones are for public safety, not intimidating illegal border crossers. Nope we wouldn’t do that. We only try and intimidate people of our own country, says Obama’s DHS fat lady.
More liberal word-play.
Here she is in full regalia ..
Who knew. Do you wonder how military spy drones improve public safety?
The United States already uses surveillance drones on its borders, but Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said during a hearing on Wednesday that flying unmanned aircraft inside the US could be the next step to ensuring “public safety.”
Sec. Napolitano weighed in on the topic of unmanned aerial vehicles during this week’s Committee on Homeland Security and suggested that implementing UAVs for domestic surveillance could the next step in the United States’ amazingly accelerating drone program.
The Federal Aviation Administration is currently considering ground rules that will outline how the FAA can govern domestic drone use, and by 2020 they expect to see 30,000 UAVs soaring through US airspace. Speaking before a House panel on Wednesday, though, Sec. Napolitano suggested that deploying UAVs proactively to put an extra set over locales nowhere near America’s border may in fact be the next move.
“With respect to Science and Technology, that directorate, we do have a funded project,” she said. “I think it’s in California, looking at drones that could be utilized to give us situational awareness in a large public safety [matter] or disaster, such as a forest fire, and how they could give us better information.”
In a transcript of the secretary’s testimony made available after her address, Napolitano admits that the US has expanded their use or surveillance drones on America’s border with Canadain recent years, now letting UAVs monitor 950 miles of Washington State’s boundary line.
I have no idea what the spy drones flying over your property are doing. Maybe we should ask the Supreme Court to decide. Why yes that is a tax. They are still in outer soace, protecting our Constitution. Didn’t you know? And they wonder why no one approves of what they are doing.
“DHS believes these airborne images are essential for homeland defense missions, such as planning for National Special Security Events (Super Bowls or a national political conventions come to mind); enhancing border, port and airport security; as well as performing critical infrastructure inventories and assessments,” reports Government Security News.
Uh huh, sure it is. When does someone start giving rewards for shoot-downs?