IBD has an interesting article on the latest data fake out by NASA’s Dr Hansen.
Despite record snows and low temperatures around the world last month, a major Al Gore supporter says October was the hottest on record. The only thing being cooked here is not the Earth, but the books.
Since it’s now been established that the Al Gore film was mostly fiction, there isn’t much else you can do but fake the data and cook the books. Apparently that is what NASA’s Hansen thinks should pass for science to back up the AGW hoax.
Dr. Hansen has not only become global warming’s Robin to Al Gore’s Batman, he has also been a critic of the “deniers,” those who dare to insist that the debate is far from over, and that the computer models used can’t even predict the past, much less the future.
Hansen has said in the past that “heads of major fossil-fuel companies who spread disinformation about global warming should be ‘tried for high crimes against humanity and nature.’ ” They pay for self-serving studies, and any scientist who disagrees with Gore is obviously on the take.
I wonder what should be the punishment for government scientists who make yup the data to try and make the hoax seem real to the public? Surely it should be as severe as that spoken of by Hansen for the evil companies faking data, don’t you think?
Christopher Booker, writing in the U.K. Telegraph, reports that Hansen apparently has been spreading disinformation all his own to come up with a conclusion that flies in the face of empirical evidence we can see with our own eyes.
Hansen’s claim of the hottest October ever came after reports of unseasonal snow and record low temperatures.
China’s official news agency reported that Tibet had suffered its “worst snowstorm ever.”
The Swiss lowlands last month got the most snow for any October since records began.
Zurich received 20 centimeters, breaking the record of 14 cm set in 1939. Ocala, Fla., experienced the second-lowest temperature recorded for October since 1850.
Elsewhere in the U.S., the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration registered 63 local snowfall records and 115 lowest-ever temperatures for the month, and ranked it as only the 70th warmest October in 114 years. So how did Hansen claim it was the warmest?
Booker writes: “The reason for the freak figures was that scores of temperature records from Russia and elsewhere were not based on October readings at all. Figures from the previous month had simply been carried over and repeated two months running.”
It’s becoming really weird out there, as the CO2 level continues to rise, and no one really knows why that is because man’s contribution to the total is minuscule, the evidence that is viewed best with your own eyes, says it’s getting colder.
Now if you don’t care to take your own eyes a truth, you can always track solar sites which will tell you the sun has entered a particularly quite period — And yep, you guessed it, no one knows why that has happened.
Why should we take the word of agovernment scientitst to tell us thetruth about data the normal person has no way to verify, so the government can collect taxes based on the faked data? Interesting wouldn’t you say?