Regressive Taxes, ON Poor People…

With the Powerball lottery jackpot reaching a record $500 million, people from around the country are flocking to local convenience stores to try their luck. The majority of those standing in line for tickets and joining office pools are likely not habitual lottery devotees, but rather casual players who decided to get in on the fun once the media reported the unprecedented size of the pot. However, the everyday lottery business is a much grimmer affair, relying overwhelmingly on “poverty, habit, and desperation,” says Natasha Lennard at Salon:

Studies of lottery ticket sales in North Carolina, South Carolina, California, Texas and Connecticut found that per capita lottery sales are consistently higher in the poorest counties and tickets are more likely to be purchased by unemployed individuals.

“Lotteries set off a vicious cycle that not only exploits low-income individuals’ desires to escape poverty but also directly prevents them from improving upon their financial situations,”

a 2008 study by Carnegie Mellon’s Tepper School of Business noted.

The study, aligning with national statistics, found that people who felt poor were found to buy double the number of lottery tickets.

“Households that earn at most $13,000 a year spend 9 percent of their money on lottery tickets.”

One of the main justifications behind lotteries is that the government — at both the state and federal levels — pockets a portion of the jackpot to finance education programs and the like. Consequently, the lottery has often been compared to a regressive tax, one that costs the poor more proportionately than it does the rich.

The lottery is a regressive tax on mathematical skills.

It’s obvious why the poor fall for our song and dance man’s street corner jive talk.

Maybe hard work would serve you better. Just saying.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: