What debate — our dear leader will decide all for you.
Or otherwise know as who needs electricity anyway? Your cellphone runs on batteries!
IN RESPONSE TO AN ATTEMPT TO “REINVENT” THE CLIMATE-CHANGE DEBATE,
WILL BAUDE PROVIDES THIS:
We may well be causing climate change, but it’s not clear there’s anything we as individuals or we as a country are really equipped to do about it. So much of the damage is already done, and so much of the future damage will be caused by activities that the United States government can’t control, that no useful policy proposals that are plausible– or even conceivable given our current political institutions. Thus, the science of climate change really isn’t relevant to any important decisions, or even any important political activism, until scientific solutions or political institutions radically change. We can just ignore it.
Related: The Economist: A Cooling Consensus. “Dramatic warming may exact a terrible price in terms of human welfare, especially in poorer countries. But cutting emissions enough to put a real dent in warming may also put a real dent in economic growth. This could also exact a terrible humanitarian price, especially in poorer countries.”
If the global warming hoax were actually real that is. Didn’t anyone read “Climategate” … Consensus is not science, have you forgot? And Co2 driven warming is a problematic dishonest hoax.
Get your car, get your freedom to travel. And let’s drive up the costs of electricity … For Americans.