Global laughing ….::: Ed Driscoll on a weatherman’s Twitter meltdown.
“They are proclaiming increased confidence in their models as the discrepancies between their models and observations increase.”
Why not we ask — lets initialize the models with data we have and then predict the future that we already know. Let’s say we start with the temperature record in the year 1900, where reasonably accurate thermometers existed, and predict the temperature today. Run the models and see how it goes.
Ugh, you don’t like that?
Former UN IPCC Lead Author Richard Lindzen: ‘In attributing warming to man, they fail to point out that the warming has been small, and totally consistent with there being nothing to be alarmed about’
MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen Rips UN IPCC Report: ‘The latest IPCC report has truly sunk to level of hilarious incoherence’ — ‘It is quite amazing to see the contortions the IPCC has to go through in order to keep the international climate agenda going’
The climate models are just cheap junk, used as parlor trick fodder, to make you think they know what they are doing … is that why?
If not show me, do the test above, that I cite. Prove me wrong.