Global Warming : REAL SCIENCE UPDATE

September 4, 2013

Yes it looks like the patest science has come it …::: Svensmark’s cosmic ray theory of clouds and global warming looks to be confirmed

Yes!!! And it looks like it is confiremed.

Danish experiment suggests unexpected magic by cosmic rays in cloud formation

Researchers in the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) are hard on the trail of a previously unknown molecular process that helps commonplace clouds to form. Tests in a large and highly instrumented reaction chamber in Lyngby, called SKY2, demonstrate that an existing chemical theory is misleading.

Back in 1996 Danish physicists suggested that cosmic rays, energetic particles from space, are important in the formation of clouds. Since then, experiments in Copenhagen and elsewhere have demonstrated that cosmic rays actually help small clusters of molecules to form. But the cosmic-ray/cloud hypothesis seemed to run into a problem when numerical simulations of the prevailing chemical theory pointed to a failure of growth.

“The result boosts our theory that cosmic rays coming from the Galaxy are directly involved in the Earth’s weather and climate,” says Henrik Svensmark, lead author of the new report.

It’s too complicated to recite hear. But it is significant to our understanding earth’s climate/weather. And that all points to it’s going to get a lot colder, in the coming years. Our current Interglacial period, the Holocene period, is coming to a close.

The Holocene is the name given to the last 11,700 years of the Earth’s history — the time since the end of the last major glacial epoch, or “ice age.” Since then, there have been small-scale climate shifts — notably the “Little Ice Age” between about 1200 and 1700 A.D. — but in general, the Holocene has been a relatively warm period in between ice ages.

Read the linked article if you want to know more.

All theories can be tested.

The sun is doing this, and Ap is the mechanism.


Climategate: FOIA – The Man Who Saved The World – Telegraph Blogs

March 16, 2013

By exposing governmentlies … FOIA statnds for Freedom of Information act …. Or how government was scamming it’s own peopel to come up with a fasle claim for more taxes.

I hope one day that FOIA’s true identity can be revealed so that he can be properly applauded and rewarded for his signal service to mankind. He is a true hero, who deserves to go on the same roll of honour as Norman Borlaug, Julian Simon and Steve McIntyre: people who put truth, integrity and the human race first and ideology second. Unlike the misanthropic greenies who do exactly the opposite.

FOIA – the anonymous leaker who brought the Climategate and Climategate II emails to light has emerged briefly from the shadows. He has released to selected parties (not me) the password to the cache of Climategate II emails in the hope that someone will have the time and energy to sift through them in search of exciting new revelations about the ongoing “Climate Change” scam. No doubt we’ll hear much more in the coming weeks. In the meantime, I think it’s worth dwelling on some of the clues he offers as to his identity and motivation. (I’m assuming it is a “he”, btw).

Here, via Bishop Hill, is the relevant passage.

Read the rest of this entry »


Climategate 2.0

November 23, 2011

The  New York Times says it ruins the progresss being made at the new IPCC climate scam conference. Well wasn’t that the intent? I am sure you at the times can figure it out … Durbin takes the hit next week.

Lies are never good policy.

Aw it hurts — From an outraged (at the leak) New York Times:

New Trove of Stolen E-Mails From Climate Scientists Is Released

By JUSTIN GILLIS and LESLIE KAUFMAN
November 22, 2011

The anonymous hacker who shook the world of climate science two years ago by posting a trove of stolen e-mails delivered a new batch on Tuesday, stirring up climate-change contrarians a little more than a week before global negotiations on greenhouse gases are to begin in Durban, South Africa.

What a typically unbiased lede sentence from the New York Times. Some “anonymous hacker” “stole e-mails” from “scientists” just “to stir up climate-change contrarians” and hurt vital “global negotiations.”

The new e-mails appeared remarkably similar to the ones released two years ago just ahead of a similar conference in Copenhagen. They involved the same scientists and many of the same issues, and some of them carried a similar tone: catty remarks by the scientists, often about papers written by others in the field.

You see? Just like those earlier emails, these have no significance. They just contain “catty remarks” by scientists. There is no scandal. No scientific malfeasance.

Climate scientists said the release was likely intended to torpedo any potential progress in the Durban negotiations, though not much progress had been expected anyway given that countries have been reluctant to commit to binding emissions limits.

Yes, everything is bent towards stopping those negotiations. Sheesh.

Meanwhile, whatever happened to information being released because of ‘the public’s right to know’? Doesn’t The Times use that as an excuse to publish every national security secret they can get their hands on?

The University of East Anglia, the British institution at the middle of the previous hacking episode, confirmed that at least some of the newly released e-mails were authentic. The cache released in 2009 appeared to have come from a file someone obtained by hacking into the university’s computers, a crime for which no charges have been filed or suspects named. The new batch of more than 5,000 e-mails is evidently a fresh selection from the same set of records.

Just like back in 2009, the New York Times and the rest of the mainstream media and the rest of the Democrat Party are outraged at the supposed crime of hacking into computers.

Sort of makes a mockery of the first investigative government panel who issued their lying report.

Sigh ….


The Day After, The Teleprompter Stopped The World

December 19, 2009

The London Telegraph weighs in: Copenhagen climate conference: global warming talks meltdown

The President calmly pronounced that a deal had been done. It was not sufficient to fight climate change and it was not legally binding but it would do, he said.

The ‘Copenhagen Accord’ was immediately attacked by the French, the Germans and the British but they accepted it and so did the world’s press as deadlines loomed.

However there are 192 countries in the UN process and they all need to sign. Many are angry. They call the “accord”, pushed through by the Americans and barely acknowledged by China – even though they have apparently signed up – a joke.

In the early hours of the morning, as delegates limped out into the snow it was still unclear whether a deal has actually been done.

And all for what is now a provable fraud on the world’s people. All the leaked emails and files from the East Anglia CRU did was to prove, the AGW fraudsters know the truth as well.

The magic Obama smoke is all gone, finny, kaput. Turn the teleprompter off and go home.


Communists and Socialists March on Copenhagen

December 18, 2009

Newsbusters:  Network journalists who were quick to see racists, haters and extremists amongst the “tea party” protesters were oblivious to communists in the “climate justice” march in Copenhagen whose cause they trumpeted

So that’s where the old Soviet commies went. Those are some banners you have there, do you know what they mean? Can you actually read them?

And if you need some more inspiration, try the beautiful music from Van Jones, here and here.


%d bloggers like this: