What this story tells us, is that too many women are sadly misinformed when guns and crime are concerned.
So if an assault weapons banned is so good, why did the last one we had, do exactly nothing?
Else you get gun control with the Mcauliffe …::: TERRY MCAULIFFE PLEDGES TO ENACT COLORADO-STYLE GUN CONTROL…
This week Starbucks issued a statement requesting that customers no longer carry weapons into their stores. The coffee giant stopped short of an outright ban, and also said customers carrying weapons will not be asked to leave. However, many gun owners saw this as the company taking a step towards…
The train chugs on, as our ruling classes lunacy spreads …
Could it be that we now have a government so big, that it can’t even make use of what laws it has, to do the job it is tasked with doing … The answer always seems to be if we just had one more law.
That’s just stupid.
Background checks certainly worked well at the Navy Yard.
The killer had a SECRET clearance. And supposedly that meant the FBI interviews the person before clearing them … Worked fine, he was being treated a month before the shooting rampage, for mental illness. So what good would more checks do. Apparently you didn’t even use what laws you had with the killer.
Wise up people … Anybody???
Harry Reid has vowed to continue working on extended background checks for gun owners, but concedes that he doesn’t have the votes to pass it. But Vice President Joe Biden claimed that several republicans told him they had changed their mind. Where are they. In the wake of the Washington Naval Yard shootings, many democrats were hopeful to pass new gun legislation.
We have had a NICs background check system for every gun bought in the USA, for decades. What more??? So continue wasting your time Harry, it’s better than cranking out new crap laws.