Ethanol typically sells for less per gallon than gasoline, but “engines do not run on gallons, they run on energy,” and a gallon of ethanol has only 67% of the net energy in a gallon of gasoline. It’s physics really, nothing too complicated for the average politicians. But politicians love to push the corn around, as if they know what they are doing. Actually I think it’s the money that is the source of politicians cronyism …
Every motor head knows that ethanol works in engines, but it’s flaw is it attracts water. Water is not a lubricant, does damage to car engines(rust, corrosion) made of materials man can find and make in large quantities.
Early in the history of the internal combustion engines, all kinds, the search for a suitable fuel was on. They tried corn ethanol, for regular spark plug engines, worked fine, produced less power. They tried peanut oil for diesels, bio-diesel, worked fine. These recent discoveries are at least a 100 years old. BTW, fracking is at least 60 years old, and flaming water wells are nothing new to people who live where the ground is loaded with natural gas.
But then along came oil. refining and oil. It had lubricity as well. Fuel and oil, in the same barrel. Good stuff, cheap, so why not.
For everyone except liberals. They hated the nasty oil stuff, the taste of freedom one gets from driving where they wanted, when they wanted. That was the real source of liberals hate, freedom.
Today, FarmEcon LLC released RFS, Fuel and Food Prices, and the Need for Statutory Flexibility, a study of ethanol’s impact on food and fuel prices. FarmEcon prepared the study for the American Meat Institute, California Dairies Inc., Milk Producers Council, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, National Chicken Council, National Pork Producers Council, and National Turkey Federation.
The study argues that the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), commonly known as the ethanol mandate, is detrimental to both non-ethanol industry corn users and food and fuel consumers. The program should therefore be reformed. The RFS has “destabilized corn and ethanol prices by offering an almost risk-free demand volume guaranty to the corn-based ethanol industry.” Consequently, food producers who use corn as a feedstock “have been forced to bear a disproportionate share of market and price risk” when corn yields fall and prices rise. This has become painfully obvious in recent weeks as drought conditions in the Midwest depress yields and push corn prices to record highs.
OK, a little physics are in order. Fuels are not renewable. Once you burn the tree all that is left is ashes. No matter how many ceremonial liberal dances that are preformed, the fuel does not renew, the tree does not grow again. You can plant new trees and they will grow, but the one you burnt remains kaput. So ‘renewable fuel’ is a liberal oxymoron that does not hunt. And no, electricity for your battery car is not renewable either. Yikes, don’t get any on your Birkenstocks.
Liberals love to make up words for things they want to be, but aren’t.
As Reagan once said of liberals: “”Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.”
Or they change word meanings to suit. That’s the advantage of controlling the language.
You must be logged in to post a comment.