Got to save the hoax …. Global warming gets nearly twice as much taxpayer money as border security (Priorities!!)
Hey I didn’t know nothing …
A new record: the most sea ice in Antarctica in 30 years by extent and by volume
Where did global warming go, a question that has been problematic for the left for years now …
I guess the crackpots have a problem with their impossible dream …
REPORT: ‘2013 ranks as one of the least extreme US weather years ever’…
And here is crackpot number one …. AL GORE: ‘Extreme’ weather, ‘increasing storms’ and ‘other extreme events’…
What happenes to you when the data meets up with reality.
IPCC Calls Off Planetary Emergency.
“IPCC now believes that in the 21st Century, Atlantic Ocean circulation collapse is ‘very unlikely,’ ice sheet collapse is ‘exceptionally unlikely,’ and catastrophic release of methane hydrates from melting permafrost is ‘very unlikely.’”
NYT’s Editorial Announces It Was A Mistake to Take the Mann Hockey Stick “Seriously”
It was based on throughly fudged and faked data for the get go. All you need do is read the EAE emails, visit “climategate.org” for more …
A mistake???” You mean global warming was a mistake:
You may wonder why such a statement would be made in the New York Times.
IPCC Jump the shark and sailed right out of the pond. Al gore and his historical ranting is just not worth the time or effort to put here.
But the truth deniers at the UN, here is a recap how well the computer models predict reality …
Every one of their computer models fail. As near everyone in the world press, have now acknowledged. Something is wrong with the models.
IPCC Fails To Come Clean Over Global Temperature Standstill. With Obama to tax, tax, and tax Americans some more, why would yu think they would cut off the free money tap
The fight goes on, the tooth fairy vs the people. So who are the deniers now? If you want a real test of your dumb computer models do what engineers do, set the initial conditions to the earliest point you have real temperature data, then run the models to the present, and see ho good bad they do. the graphic above, it’s just the short version of the test I propose.
Today’s the big day when the UN IPCC must announce how they expect to hide the bad news from themselves.
The global warming hoaxers need new words and concepts, to confuse the unwary … Global warming ‘hiatus’ puts climate change scientists on the spot
Hide the heat is the latest …
So we may as well get the facts right on the table. Before the Democrats and the warmists have you jumping up and saying it’s the volcanoes that did it.
Did what, slowed warming with cooling… Might we see your data?
The report is due … “fifth assessment report,” part of which will be published on Sept. 27, 2013.
With CO2 still rising, you would think???
The report, which cites thousands of peer-reviewed articles the United Nations-sponsored panel on climate change ignored, also found that “no empirical evidence exists to substantiate the claim that 2°C of warming presents a threat to planetary ecologies or environments” and no convincing case can be made that “a warming will be more economically costly than an equivalent cooling.” The U.N.’s panel is scheduled to release its next report next month.
The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, or NIPCC, which produced the report, is described as “an international panel of scientists and scholars who came together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change.” Unlike the “United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is government-sponsored, politically motivated, and predisposed to believing that climate change is a problem in need of a U.N. solution,” NIPCC “has no formal attachment to or sponsorship from any government or governmental agency” and is “wholly independent of political pressures and influences and therefore is not predisposed to produce politically motivated conclusions or policy recommendations.”
The report blows away the Warmist hysteria regarding sea rise, temperature rise, melting glaciers, “extreme” weather, the Arctic, and every other bit of doom and gloom.
“We conclude no unambiguous evidence exists for adverse changes to the global environment caused by human-related CO2 emissions,” the authors write. “In particular, the cryosphere is not melting at an enhanced rate; sea-level rise is not accelerating; no systematic changes have been documented in evaporation or rainfall or in the magnitude or intensity of extreme meteorological events; and an increased release of methane into the atmosphere from permafrost or sub-seabed gas hydrates is unlikely.”
I’d highly recommend reading at least the Summary For Policymakers. The study focuses on actual observable data, rather than computer models, micro-reconstructions, and “normalized” data. Nor does it completely dismiss what Mankind does, but notes that our works are miniscule in comparison to natural variability.
*Note: the attached graphic is not from the report, but one that has been out that highlights the difference between the Warmist computer models and real world observations.
You must be logged in to post a comment.